Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Hazing means Brutality in HBCU's band

http://www.npr.org/2011/12/07/143211079/for-some-marching-bands-hazing-means-brutality?sc=fb&cc=fp

For Some Marching Bands, Hazing Means Brutality

The Marching 100, Florida A&M University's band, performs on the field before Super Bowl XLIV, Feb. 7, 2010. The band's director, Julian White, was fired in November after a band member died, allegedly from a hazing incident on a bus.

The Marching 100, Florida A&M University's band, performs on the field before Super Bowl XLIV, Feb. 7, 2010. The band's director, Julian White, was fired in November after a band member died, allegedly from a hazing incident on a bus.

Every now and then, as a journalist, you want to think that you haven't just done a good "story," but maybe you've actually brought attention to something that can actually do good.

I dared feel that a year ago, when I reported a piece for the HBO show Real Sports With Bryant Gumbel. The story was about violent hazing in the marching bands at HBCUs –– historically black colleges and universities.

At first, as the producer, Josh Fine, outlined the horrors of what was passed off as merely typical old college hazing, I doubted him. I couldn't believe that the premeditated violence that Fine described could possibly be that brutal, that widespread, and that, essentially, enabled by the institutions.

But then, as I interviewed band members at HBCUs, my disbelief grew into shock, as I learned about behavior that was, effectively, institutional torture.

New band members –– called "crabs" –– had to face choreographed assaults, with two-by-fours, belts, baseball bats, beer bottles, suffering literally hundreds of blows from their older compatriots. For example, an Alabama A&M flute player vividly told me about how she'd been attacked, time and time again, by the older flutists.

Yes. Even flute players. Even women. Women battering each other.

The victims also admitted, grievously, that they succumbed to a horrible psychological turnabout, because as painfully injured as they'd been when they were beaten, they themselves willingly became the twisted assailants the next year.

"[It got] your blood boiling for the next person, like a vampire lookin' for blood," one French horn player told me.

And so the brutality continued, validated as a way of building band camaraderie.

And so the excuses continued, because HBCU bands are the headliners –– literally more popular than the football teams that they play for at halftime. The band director at Florida A&M, Julian White, responded to my report by saying that I was just a prejudiced outsider, who "made it seem like black schools are the only places where it's happening. ... That's just not the case."

I'm sorry, but that is precisely the case. It is the culture.

So extreme has been the band torture at HBCUs that some victims have had to be hospitalized. After one crab at Southern University almost died when his kidneys stopped functioning, his assailants were criminally prosecuted, because, an assistant district attorney told me, "To continue that cycle ... somebody was gonna die."

Still, when my piece aired, there were no apologies, and worse: no change in the way things had always been. The bands must play on. Then, last month, a member of White's Florida A&M band died of alleged beatings at the hands of his comrades, in the line of tradition.

White has been fired by Florida A&M, but perhaps now they won't just call this sort of thing hazing anymore, anywhere.



I don't know if anyone is still keeping up with the blogs however I came across this piece and felt it was important.

I found this article extremely disturbing; not because of the hazing but rather the extent of it. I can understand about wanting to build camaraderie however the type of leadership exhibited by the band leader in question, actually the culture in question, is reprehensible. He had full knowledge of what was going on and to what extent. I believe he should be formally charged as an accessory to murder. There is more to it however I would need to take time and reflect on the situation further as such flagrant disregard for the welfare of people under Julian White's leadership simply leaves me at a loss.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Pepper-Sprayed for being Non-Violent?


Wow! The campus police made a big mistake. Students at the University of California at Davis were pepper sprayed as they sat peaceful arms linked together protesting non-violently. And if being pepper sprayed isn’t bad enough, they were also jabbed with police batons. Thank goodness for everyone shooting footage because the public can have an eyewitness account of the unnecessary act of the campus police. The officers who sprayed the students were suspended with pay and according to reports, Chancellor Linda Katehi, is the person who ordered the police to use the pepper spray. Once word got out of this, students and some faculty called for her resignation. Katehi issued a statement saying she would form a committee to investigate what happened and report to the campus community within 90 days.

What started the whole ordeal was police were ordered to remove the students and their tents from the premises. The students were part of the Occupy movement, in which they were protesting against economic inequality, tuition increases, budget cuts at the University of California, and interestingly enough police conduct. The students ignored the request by the police to disperse, so then the students were peppered sprayed and were physically removed one-by-one. Katehi called for a review of student conduct policy to find out if the police did or did not act in accordance with policy. And if they did, then she wants to change the policy so that students can protest within reason and not worry about being harmed by campus police.           

Katehi is drawing much criticism from everyone. The president of the University of California system issued a statement saying the incident was appalling and there needs to be an effort made to ensure peaceful protests go unharmed. On Saturday, the day after the incident, students’ anger rose to which they protested against Katehi by lining the walkway from the office to her car as she exited the campus. Students did not say a word they just stood around her in silence. Katehi did not acknowledge them at all. Katehi issued a statement saying she would address the students in the coming days and that she needs to regain the students’ trust, so the first thing she did was place the chief of police on administrative leave Monday morning after gathering more information. Even observers in the community who do not agree with the Occupy movement, showed sympathy toward the students and agree that the police were out of line with over aggressive actions.

In closing, it will be interesting to see if Katehi retains her position. I feel she has a lot of explaining to do and she obviously does not understand student protest. If she was the person who ordered the use of the aggressive action by campus police, she should be removed or state that she was wrong in her decision. She has yet to do either. I think what she should have done was went out to where the students were protesting and speak to them as her students instead of stereotyping them as an out-of- control mob. One would think that she would have student affairs qualities mastered by now to be able to reach out or show compassion for the students. This was a good lesson for her of what not to do during a non-violent student protest.