Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Stand in Solidarity with Occupy Wall Street... and Whatever it May Actually Stand For?

(Caution – My politics may be showing)

Professional organizations serve a variety of purposes for the people they serve. Among those purposes one often finds lobbying government officials and working towards the improvement of their field. It is also often the role of these organizations to serve as the voice of their constituents on key political or economic issues and to issue press releases.

The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) website defines their purpose as follows:

The AAUP's purpose is to advance academic freedom and shared governance, to define fundamental professional values and standards for higher education, and to ensure higher education's contribution to the common good.

The AAUP put out press release yesterday proclaiming that they “stand in solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement.” The release goes on to frame several issues of concern surrounding equality and the economy, funding for higher education, and the security of faculty jobs. They conclude their press release by stating, “we strongly support the movement and wish it every success. We are in this together.”

What? Seriously? Wow.

While the statements the AAUP make concerning the economy, decreased funding for higher education, and even about the tenuous nature of faculty jobs are sound (and in many ways represent the profession they serve), they are not really echoed by or connected with the messaging of the Occupy Wall Street movement. In fact, one of the biggest challenges with the OWS movement has been its lack of cohesive message. The movement’s messages have ranged from demanding that politicians pay attention the little people, to calling for a military coup to overthrow the government and dismantle corporations.

One publication summarizes the goals of the movement as follows:

Occupy Wall Street” has listed virtually every progressive concern of the early 21st century in its current manifesto – from environmental degradation and corporate greed to animal rights and gender, race, and age equality, as well as collective bargaining rights. Now a new item has emerged, listing access to higher education as a basic human right, perhaps not surprising considering the youthful face of the movement.

I wonder which of the goals the AAUP stand in solidarity with?

I am not opposed to an organization making a statement about the tenuous nature of our economy and the impact it is having on many professions and professionals. Such a statement seems appropriate given the national dialogue concerning these issues. I am concerned when rather than making a statement that mirrors the needs of the membership, the organization associates and connects itself with an ill-defined and polarizing movement. How does a connection with such a movement serve to enhance the purpose of the AAUP?

In general I am weary of whole-heartedly supporting anything that the Daily Show spends ten minutes mocking and tearing apart. I am also weary of any movement or message that it is both panned and endorsed by Fox News and its viewers due to its lack of clarity and cohesiveness. I am honestly frightened when both of the above are true for the same thing. Occupy Wall Street fits neatly into this frightening category.

I encourage you to watch the Daily Show clip and answer the Fox News poll question. Hopefully this will illustrate the point I am trying to make and it will make you smile.

5 comments:

  1. I was intrigued when I saw your blog because just this morning as I got ready the news covered this OWS event in Longmont (about 4 times before I left for work). In addition, they mirrored just what one of your quotes said… a large group of people standing on the corner with signs ranging from out of work researcher (literally) and needs for public schools. The movement seems disorganized but it is getting attention from media, politian’s, and it was covered on Face the Nation.

    I took the Fox News poll and I was a maybe. I do not know if these folks are right but I do know that they are covering many issues. I am surprised to see the AAUP release a statement on the OWS movement when they seem to have such a specific purpose. I guess here is hoping to the fact they are aligned with a specific piece of the OWS but then again there is always the benefit of being recognized of having a stance...I think.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Okay, so I am writing this other blog post called, "Free, Global Education" in the Access section and I decided to take a break and do some reading and commenting instead. The professor whom I am writing about just posted this video: http://youtu.be/zErc2US4amE that addresses a lot of your issue with the OWS "protest". Note the air quotes. Watch the vid, I think you'll like it because Dr. Campbell spends a lot of time articulately questioning the goals, messaging, assembly technique, and general merriment on the OWS. I think this is the big difference between sit-ins today and the movements of the 1960's and 1970's--but it was also more difficult to assemble then since it wasn't possible to Facebook your friends to come hang out for a few hours.

    There are too many messages flying about on Wall Street, not to mention the $1.9 million in overtime that citizens are paying the NYPD just to keep the peace. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44851474/ns/us_news-life/

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to admit, I haven't spent much time watching any news lately. I find that it hurts my head a little... I identify with Jon Stewarts joke about how the media only has 2 settings: blackout and circus.

    Whenever there is a protest that is featured on the "news" channels, I definitely want to know more about what exactly is behind the motivation to demonstrate. This however, is unorganized, as most critics have pointed out.

    The exhausting part of watching these things on TV is that they become a catch-all on both sides of what is wrong with society. I am all about a good conversation about politics, but that doesn't come from groups or individuals with such lack of focus.

    I did not realize how much money was going to NYPD just to keep the peace, that makes their point somewhat hypocritical...that 1.9 million could go to hire more teachers or to renovations of schools that need it. They weren't thinking about that I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I admit that I have not taken the Occupy Protests seriously because of the lack of a clear and cogent message and the evident lack of leadership. However, after reading an article in the Greeley Tribune this morning, I now have a different perspective in relation to the aforementioned critiques.

    According to the article "Can 'Occupy' protests last without leaders?" the lack of leadership and the broad message of dissent have achieved greater global support than what has happened in recent years with protests aimed with a singular goal such ending the war in Iraq. The article went on to illustrate the involvement of over 13 countries. The broad, undefined message allows for people of vastly different backgrounds to come together for an overarching purpose of betterment for humanity. For example, have there been any public dissents of late to bring media attention that can count among their supporters the AAUP and a laid off auto worker? It was also noted in the article that the "...decentralization is deliberate and note that other movements, like the 1960's civil rights effort, began in a similarly disorganized way." (http://www.greeleytribune.com/)

    ReplyDelete
  5. The "Occupy" movements have been really frustrating for me, especially being a part of the generation that is receiving the most criticism/blame for the movement. I listened to a lot of talk radio this weekend and they continually reference the protesters as young, naive, and misinformed. While I agree that many of the protesters don't understand the implications of what they're doing (the $1.9 million spent for police) or why they are even there, I hate when my generation as a whole gets clumped into this category. Many of us don't agree with the protests and aren't out there picketing without a cause. I guess this just triggered the many times I have been assumed to be a part of the technological, instant gratification, naive generation.

    ReplyDelete